ashishme
Replies to this thread:

More by ashishme
What people are reading
Subscribers
:: Subscribe
Back to: Kurakani General Refresh page to view new replies
 व्यापारमा चीनले अमेरिकालाई उछिन्यो
[VIEWED 5789 TIMES]
SAVE! for ease of future access.
Posted on 02-13-13 3:40 AM     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

एजेन्सी
बेइजिङ, २९ माघ

अमेरिकालाई उछिन्दै व्यापारिक क्षेत्रमा चीन विश्वकै सबैभन्दा ठूलो देश बनेको छ । सन् २०१२ मा दुवै देशले गरेको आयातनिर्यातको आधिकारिक आँकडाबाट यस्तो तथ्य बाहिर आएको हो ।

अमेरिकाले सन् २०१२ मा आयातनिर्यातबाट ३८.२ खर्ब डलर आम्दानी गरेको अमेरिकी वाणिज्य विभागको हवाला दिँदै 'ब्लुमबर्ग' न्युजले जनाएको छ । त्यस्तै, सन् २०१२ मा चीनले आयातनिर्यातबाट ३८.७ खर्ब डलर आम्दानी गरेको चीनको कस्टम विभागलाई उद्धृत गर्दै ब्लुमबर्गले जनाएको छ । चीनको बढ्दो वाणिज्य दबदबा उसका छिमेकी राष्ट्र तथा अन्य देशका लागि पनि खतरा भएको ब्लुमबर्गले उल्लेख गरेको छ ।

चीनले विश्वका कैयौँ देशसँग व्यापारिक सम्बन्ध जोडिरहेको अवस्थालाई मध्यनजर गर्दा आगामी दशकमा युरोपेली राष्ट्रले आपसी व्यापारभन्दा बढी चीनसँग व्यापार गर्ने अन्तर्राष्ट्रिय सञ्चारमाध्यमले प्रक्षेपण गरेका छन् ।

अमेरिकी अथर्तन्त्र चीनको भन्दा दुईगुणा बढी रहेको विश्व बैंकले जनाएको छ । यस पृष्ठभूमिमा चीनले अमेरिकालाई व्यापारमा पछि पार्नु असाधारण भएको विश्लेषण गरिएको छ । यसको मूल कारण चिनियाँ मुद्रा युआनको अवमूल्यनमात्र नभई चीनको निर्यातमा आएको बढोत्तरी भएको बताइएको छ ।

दोस्रो विश्वयुद्धपछि अमेरिका विश्वकै ठूलो अर्थतन्त्रको रूपमा उदाएको थियो भने चीनले माओत्सेतुङको निधनपछि सन् १९७६ बाट मात्र अर्थतन्त्रमा ध्यान दिन थालेको हो । २००९ मा चीन विश्वमा सबैभन्दा बढी निर्यात गर्ने देश बन्न सफल भएको थियो । अमेरिका सबैभन्दा बढी आयात गर्ने देशमा पर्छ ।

 

 
Posted on 02-13-13 8:48 AM     [Snapshot: 108]     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     1       ?     Liked by
 

 यी सबै चीनको उन्नति सायद उनिहरुले ठोत्रो कमिनुजम नछोदेको भए हुन्न थियो होला ?????
Last edited: 13-Feb-13 08:49 AM

 
Posted on 02-13-13 8:49 AM     [Snapshot: 98]     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

 Are you Touting your communist roots ? lol You really think communism is a utopian society don't you ? lol Here is a lil reality check for you Son ....  http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/02/world/asia/chinese-communist-party-still-unsettled-over-changes.html?_r=0 
It looks no different than the Monarchy your comrades uprooted in Nepal. Your Maoist Nation looks more and more like a DICTATORSHIP marred with corruption and scandals.  Bhedas like you are so naive to think this is the best in the world. lol !!
 
Posted on 02-13-13 11:05 AM     [Snapshot: 214]     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

चिनको उन्नतिलाई प्रजातन्त्र र communism संग जोड्ने तिम्रो कत्ति को बौदिक स्तर छ  पुरै प्रस्ट हुन्छ !!
 
Posted on 02-13-13 11:58 AM     [Snapshot: 264]     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

कम्युनिष्ट पार्टी भन्ने केवल किताबमा र सिद्दान्तमा मात्र हुन्छ | बास्तबिकतामा त्यो भनेको निरङ्कुश पार्टी हो जसले एकतन्त्री शासन गर्नको लागि जनतामा साम्यबादको भ्रम छर्नु जरुरि छ | चीनमा विकास र प्रगति भएको कम्युनिष्ट सिद्दान्तले भन्ने कसैले सोच्छ भने त्यो झुट हो | बास्तवमा चिन पनि एउटा पुजीबादी राष्ट्र भैसकेको छ जसले आफ्नो निरंकुस शासन टिकाउनको लागि कम्युनिस्मको नाटक गर्दै छ |   
 
Posted on 02-13-13 3:58 PM     [Snapshot: 360]     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

China is a one party democratic country and USA is a two party democratic country.

There are no real communist parties anymore, its just not practical, if you need to find the closest ones then may be some of the scandanavian countries come closest to being one.

 
Posted on 02-13-13 4:16 PM     [Snapshot: 383]     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

सझामित्र: उखानले नै जाबाफ दिउ होला :
     रक्षान चलाई मुख छिटा ( तल्लो स्तरको उखान मा गु लाइ चलाई गन्ध ) |
बौदीकता त त्यो टिपन टापन गरि  टासने को नै बढी होला ? जित तिम्रै भयो |

IT _GUY  को कुरा मा तिमि सहमत छौ ? 

 
Posted on 02-13-13 6:33 PM     [Snapshot: 452]     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

Your masters Prachanda and Baburam are the villains and they should be imprisoned for life along with other cash and dash maoists.






 
Posted on 02-13-13 10:15 PM     [Snapshot: 566]     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

Is the United States a democracy?

The Pledge of Allegiance includes the phrase: "and to the republic for which it stands." Is the United States of America a republic? I always thought it was a democracy? What's the difference between the two?

The United States is, indeed, a republic, not a democracy. Accurately defined, a democracy is a form of government in which the people decide policy matters directly--through town hall meetings or by voting on ballot initiatives and referendums. A republic, on the other hand, is a system in which the people choose representatives who, in turn, make policy decisions on their behalf. The Framers of the Constitution were altogether fearful of pure democracy. Everything they read and studied taught them that pure democracies "have ever been spectacles of turbulence and contention; have ever been found incompatible with personal security or the rights of property; and have in general been as short in their lives as they have been violent in their deaths" (Federalist No. 10).

By popular usage, however, the word "democracy" come to mean a form of government in which the government derives its power from the people and is accountable to them for the use of that power. In this sense the United States might accurately be called a democracy. However, there are examples of "pure democracy" at work in the United States today that would probably trouble the Framers of the Constitution if they were still alive to see them. Many states allow for policy questions to be decided directly by the people by voting on ballot initiatives or referendums. (Initiatives originate with, or are initiated by, the people while referendums originate with, or are referred to the people by, a state's legislative body.) That the Constitution does not provide for national ballot initiatives or referendums is indicative of the Framers' opposition to such mechanisms. They were not confident that the people had the time, wisdom or level-headedness to make complex decisions, such as those that are often presented on ballots on election day.

Writing of the merits of a republican or representative form of government, James Madison observed that one of the most important differences between a democracy and a republic is "the delegation of the government [in a republic] to a small number of citizens elected by the rest." The primary effect of such a scheme, Madison continued, was to:

. . . refine and enlarge the public views by passing them through the medium of a chosen body of citizens whose wisdom may best discern the true interest of their country and whose patriotism and love of justice will be least likely to sacrifice it to temporary or partial considerations. Under such a regulation it may well happen that the public voice, pronounced by the representatives of the people, will be more consonant to the public good than if pronounced by the people themselves, convened for the same purpose (Federalist No. 10).

Later, Madison elaborated on the importance of "refining and enlarging the public views" through a scheme of representation:

There are particular moments in public affairs when the people, stimulated by some irregular passion, or some illicit advantage, or misled by the artful misrepresentations of interested men, may call for measures which they themselves will afterwards be most ready to lament and condemn. In these critical moments, how salutary will be the interference of some temperate and respectable body of citizens, in order to check the misguided career and to suspend the blow meditated by the people against themselves, until reason, justice and truth can regain their authority over the public mind(Federalist No. 63).

In the strictest sense of the word, the system of government established by the Constitution was never intended to be a "democracy." This is evident not only in the wording of the Pledge of Allegiance but in the Constitution itself which declares that "The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government" (Article IV, Section 4). Moreover, the scheme of representation and the various mechanisms for selecting representatives established by the Constitution were clearly intended to produce a republic, not a democracy.

To the extent that the United States of America has moved away from its republican roots and become more "democratic," it has strayed from the intentions of the Constitution's authors. Whether or not the trend toward more direct democracy would be smiled upon by the Framers depends on the answer to another question. Are the American people today sufficiently better informed and otherwise equipped to be wise and prudent democratic citizens than were American citizens in the late 1700s? By all accounts, the answer to this second question is an emphatic "no."


 
Posted on 02-13-13 10:17 PM     [Snapshot: 568]     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 
 
Posted on 02-14-13 10:39 AM     [Snapshot: 684]     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

खोइ कता लुक्यो यहाँको प्रजातान्त्रिक पाखेहरु

 
Posted on 02-14-13 11:36 AM     [Snapshot: 721]     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

रनडिको बान : चीनमा पानि पर्यो ओड छाता नेपालमा :
                     केको घोक्रो फ़ुलाउछस खर्पटे |

 
Posted on 02-14-13 11:41 AM     [Snapshot: 724]     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

 तेरो बाउको पाखे. तेरो बाउले ग्यास को भाउ एकैचोटी रु ६३० बडाको चै होला देमोक्रेशी तेरो लागि हैन ?
 


Please Log in! to be able to reply! If you don't have a login, please register here.

YOU CAN ALSO



IN ORDER TO POST!




Within last 30 days
Recommended Popular Threads Controvertial Threads
TPS Re-registration case still pending ..
To Sajha admin
I hope all the fake Nepali refugee get deported
and it begins - on Day 1 Trump will begin operations to deport millions of undocumented immigrants
Travel Document for TPS (approved)
All the Qatar ailines from Nepal canceled to USA
Those who are in TPS, what’s your backup plan?
MAGA and all how do you feel about Trumps cabinet pick?
MAGA मार्का कुरा पढेर दिमाग नखपाउनुस !
NOTE: The opinions here represent the opinions of the individual posters, and not of Sajha.com. It is not possible for sajha.com to monitor all the postings, since sajha.com merely seeks to provide a cyber location for discussing ideas and concerns related to Nepal and the Nepalis. Please send an email to admin@sajha.com using a valid email address if you want any posting to be considered for deletion. Your request will be handled on a one to one basis. Sajha.com is a service please don't abuse it. - Thanks.

Sajha.com Privacy Policy

Like us in Facebook!

↑ Back to Top
free counters