Some royalists have started new threads to divert attention of people in Sajha from the Nagarkot incident and the condition in Nepal now. It is good to argue with someone who has rational views and defending something logical. In my opinion, it is no use to argue with these paras ass lickers. We are helping them put their thread always at top. In my opinion it is better if we just ignore these royalist threads.

These assholes are trying to glorify the demon, the curse to our nation.
I read that he has fled to Pokhara. And he will flee from Nepal soon.

I agree with gautamji

॥॥॥I read that he has fled to Pokhara. And he will flee from Nepal soon.॥॥॥

hahahhaha Gautam Ji, nice saying.

I am with you Gautam Jee. We want Democracy in Nepal. Republic NEPAL

Gautam Jee,

It is your, the newbies in Sajha, turn to ignore them. We, some oldies in Sajha, have been doing such (ignoring them) since a long time back.

It is useless to discuss/argue with these nicknames:
1. Dell
2. Saroj
3. Cryptonite
4. Highfly
5. ShresthaN
6. Bhoonte
7 Nepalki Choori
8. f22
9. Sriyak
10. III_II_I_II_III
11. and few other nicknames.

Do not surprise seeing a long list. All these nick names are from a very few people, maximum 2 or 3.

-General

(PS: Do not include Isolated_Freak and Ashu here. In spite of their support to royal, it is, at least, worth discussing with them).

And, dada_giri,

He is good at telling stories than commenting on politics.

-General

General, please refrain from calling people royalist just because they do not support your political beliefs. I know and do read few comments from the names you have posted above whom you have labeled as royalists. Many old and self-acclaimed or acclaimed by peers "budhi jibi" here in sajha very often label people as royalists when their opinions contradict with other people.
Please remember that they are not only royalists, political party leaders supporter, maoists sympathisers here in sajha. There are others who want democracy in Nepal as soon as possible but are tired and sick of supporting the current inept political leaders. And I find a lot of those names you have mentioned in that group.

गोताएँ जी,
कुरो एक दम ठीक गर्नु भो ।
र जर्नेल सापले पनि । तर जर्नेल सापको लिस्टोमा एउटा नाम बायुपँखी (highfly) सँग भने मेरो कुरो मिले जस्तो लागो है मलाई त,
राजालाई मन नपराउने भन्दा पनि उहाँ ( र म पनि) गिरिजा र माधब नेपाल लाई झन् बढी मन नपराउन पनि त उचित छ नि हैन र ?
र मेरो पनि लक्ष - चाहनाको पराकाष्ठा भनेकै नेपालमा शान्ति र तिब्बको स्वतन्त्रता, कति मजा हुँदो हो त्यसो भए, हैन र ?
गिरिजा र माकुने जस्ता दहिचिउरेको के ठेगान, बरु राजाको त कमसेकम स्पष्ट बाटो त छ, हैन र ?

anyway,
Keep rolling...

ho ni, rajako bato ta prastai chha 250 barsa ko itihas and uncertain life span of parasitism. How can we be sure of political leaders coz' they get changed so often n' host (people) have the choice of changing not only the parasite but also getting something as so called symbiotic organisms. Thus, we should support the KNOWN SPECIES of parasite over the UKNOWN.

Shree 5, what is this "-----तिब्बको स्वतन्त्रता-----" ? Please clarify.

गोताएँ जी,
तिब्बत लेखेको तिब्ब भएछ कि सिमा खानी ।

ख्वै कुरो बुझेको ?

Keep rolling...

मलाई किन किन तिब्बत चाईना हो जस्तो कहिले पनि लागेन यार, उनीहरु धेरै फरक छन्, बरु ताईवान र मेनल्याण्ड चाईना केही फरक छैनन् तर तिब्बतलाई साले च्याङ्ग्रेहरुले खाएको किन किन मनै पर्दैन के ।

Keep rolling...

I just saw this:

"(PS: Do not include Isolated_Freak and Ashu here. In spite of their support to royal, it is, at least, worth discussing with them)."


The first part of the SECOND sentence is ridiculous.

I, let the record state, have NEVER supported, wholesale, any political party, nor have
I supported, wholesale, the Royals, nor have I ever supported, wholesale, the Maoists.

I reserve my right to be critical of them -- either in print, on the Web or in private conversations.

That said, I am also tired of self-described "democrats" who shout for big democracy WITHOUT appearing to do small, small things to strengthen parts of democracy.

True, in my Sajha debates with Nepe -- who's idelogically republican, and that's fine --
he, given his Marxist proclivities, found it convenient to stamp me with such a label to score some cheap political points.

But that's the way Nepe, the scientist from New Jersey is: If you agree with him, he praises you to the skies; if you disagree with him, he throws labels at you.

****
As a thinking person, I like to take EVERY THING on a case-by-case basis, and like to decide my reactions to those things on their own merits, WITHOUT approaching problems with a set-in-the-stone this mindset or that ideology.

Thank you.

oohi
"striving to remain fiercely independent as always"
ashu

अनुमान त मैले त्यहि गरेको हो, तर यो अनौठो काल बेलामा श्री ५ ले अरु नै केहि पनि भन्न आँटेको हो कि भनेर क्या!
जहाँसम्म राजा र गिरिजा-माकुने लाई उत्तिकै मन नपराउने कुरा छ; मैले यसरी हेर्छु। राजाको शाशनले मलाई जति पेलेपनि मैले ऐया भन्ने अधिकार मेरो छैन, तर गिरिजा-माकुनेको शाशनमा कम्तिमा मलाई परेको अन्यायको बिरुध्द आवाज उठाउने र संगठित हुने स्वतन्त्रताचाहिँ मलाई हुन्छ। मेरो रोजाई यहि एउटा साधारण सोचले मात्रै हो। भ्रष्ट र अवसरवादी नेताको पछि लागेको हैन। मलाई के लाग्छ भने धेरै कमजोरीहरुका वावजूद पनि नेपाली प्रजातन्त्र मकरतन्त्रभन्दा सय गुना बढी ठिक थियो र आफूलाई परिमार्जन गरिरहेको थियो।

I agree with Gautam. IF makune or girija will do unjust we can kick their A$$ but we can't kick out gyane's fat A$$.

Yes, Shree 5, Tibetans are different from Chinese. Tibet is not China. Hope one day they will be free.

गोताएँजीले ठीकै भन्नु भयो होला तर मेरो बिचारमा त गिरिजा पछि त गोविन्द राज जोशी जस्ता महा-हरामहरु थिए, माकुने पछि
पनि तेस्तै "सफेदपोश" गुन्डा हरु थिए, त्यसैले मैले त तिनीहरुलाई भन्दा ज्ञाने-पारस नै ठीक मान्छु जसले कमसेकम आफ्नो परिचय कहिले लुकाएनन्।

तर "अफ कोर्स", अहिले मलाई नेपालका राजनीतिक शक्तिहरुमा सबभन्दा मन पर्ने माओवादी
र नेतृत्वमा बाबुराम भट्टराई, त्यसपछि नरहरि आचार्य हुन्। छक्क पर्नुहोला, कस्तो व्यक्तिबादी राजनैतिक सोँचाई
राख्यो बजियाले भनेर तर म राजनैतिक सिद्धान्त भन्दा ईमान्दारी हेर्छु , बेईमानले त जे पनि भन्न सक्छ हैन र, तर
ईमानदारको त जहिले पनि भर पर्न सकियो नि हैन र ?

Keep rolling...

High hopes for Tibetans.
Next thing you will say Sikkim be free from India.
If you want your country back,you should have gun in one hand and spade in another hand to make your country as the Israelese did.
Well they did after being all over the world for 2000 years .It has just been 50 years for Tibetans .May be they are waiting for the right time.

I feel very much intidimated to make any political remark regarding Nepal's politician and monarch.But as far as I am concern, I hate leaders who does things for themselvers and theircronies. To me, a good leader is one who would do anything for the betterment of the mass without giving much thought about himself. In another word others first and me last. I wonder if we have this kind Nepali leaders in Nepal. From my own observation, sad to say this that I have yet to come across above described type of person in my whole.